Know exactly what to fix next.
Yozigo reads your visibility data prompt by prompt and engine by engine, finds where you are missing or losing to competitors, and turns each gap into a concrete, ranked task — ready for your team or an AI employee.
- Establish FAQ-format answer page for “How do I know if GPTBot can access my website content?”FAQ contentNot citedMEDIUM
Yozigo is absent from Perplexity Sonar while FAQ-format pages from three third-party sites dominate grounding sources — 6 of 6 citations went to third-party FAQ content. Publish a structured FAQ answer page to close the 0% retrieval gap.Quick winOpen11 days ago - Pioneer a Perplexity AI ROI measurement guide to capture engine-wide retrieval shareContent gapNot citedMEDIUM
Yozigo is absent from every LLM when users ask how to measure ROI from Perplexity citations, while competitor blog content appeared 9 times. Publish a comprehensive guide to recover the 4.7-point predicted lift.Medium effortOpen11 days ago - Stake Yozigo in a “Best AI brand monitoring tools” listicle alongside competitorsListicle authoringNot citedMEDIUMFour third-party listicles dominate the query “How do I track my brand mentions in ChatGPT and Perplexity answers?” while Yozigo appears zero times. Author a brand-owned listicle and seed it into the same channels.Quick winOpen11 days ago
- Get listed on review sites that AI engines cite for “best GEO platform” shortlistsReview sitesCompetitor dominatedHIGHChatGPT and Perplexity build their GEO shortlists from review platforms, where two competitors hold 7 of 9 citations and Yozigo has no profile. Claim a listing and collect verified reviews to enter the shortlist.Quick winOpen9 days ago
- Refresh the AI crawler analytics guide with 2026 bot data to recover declining citationsContent refreshDeclining citationMEDIUM
Citations of the guide in AI Overviews and Gemini fell from 5 to 2 over three weeks as newer pages with current bot lists replaced it. Update the crawler list and figures to win the source back.Medium effortOpen6 days ago
Start writing- Action categories
- 4
- Opportunity types
- 19
- Playbooks
- 38
- Gap signals detected
- 11
From your site to a clear answer.
What Opportunity Finder does behind the scenes, step by step.
- 01Read the evidenceFor every prompt on every engine: whether you are retrieved, cited, and mentioned, your position and sentiment, and which competitors win and from which sources.
- 02Spot the gapSignals like not cited, retrieved but not cited, negative sentiment, declining citations, or competitor-dominated answers trigger an opportunity.
- 03Pick the playbookEach gap is matched to a specific playbook — write a comparison page, refresh a stale guide, get listed on a review site, join a Reddit thread.
- 04Write it upEvery opportunity explains the current state and the source evidence, so you know why it matters before you start.
- 05Rank by impactOpportunities are sorted by predicted lift, weighed against effort, urgency, and how many engines agree.
- 06Put it to workAssign it to an AI employee or create an action for your team. Status updates as the work moves.
Every gap lands in one of four lists.
The category comes from the type of work, so each list reads like a to-do list for one kind of team.
Specific enough to start today.
No vague advice. Each opportunity names the prompt, the engines, the evidence, and the size of the job.
Hand it off in one click.
When an opportunity matches an AI employee, assign it directly. The opportunity tracks the work from start to finish.
How opportunities are ranked.
Rankings favour gaps that are urgent, confirmed by several engines, recent, and achievable — so the top of the list is where effort pays off most.
- Predicted lift
- The expected impact of the fix, from the opportunity type, adjusted for confidence, urgency, effort, and age. The list is sorted by it.
- Confidence
- Rises when more engines show the same gap: one engine counts less than two, and three or more count fully.
- Urgency
- Negative sentiment and inaccurate citations rank highest, then competitor-dominated or declining answers, then retrieved-but-not-cited.
- Severity
- Set by urgency: Critical, High, Medium, or Low.
- Effort
- Low (about 1–2 weeks), medium (about 3 weeks), or high (about 6 weeks), depending on the type of work.
- Freshness
- Older opportunities fade over roughly two weeks, so the list reflects what AI is saying now.
Good to know
- Opportunities are generated from your tracking data automatically — you do not have to enter anything.
- Content Writer and LinkedIn Writer can pick up matching opportunities directly; other playbooks, like Reddit or PR, become actions for your team.
- Every opportunity links back to the prompt it came from, so you can check the answer yourself.
Frequently asked questions.
A specific, ranked task that closes a gap in how AI answers a prompt — for example writing a comparison page, refreshing a stale guide, or getting listed on a review site.
From your AI Visibility data. For each prompt and engine, Yozigo looks at whether you are retrieved, cited, and mentioned, your position and sentiment, and which competitors and sources win instead.
By predicted lift, which combines the opportunity type with confidence (how many engines agree), urgency, effort, and how recent the signal is.
Four categories: Content Creation, Content Refresh, Outreach, and Community Engagement — 19 opportunity types in total, backed by 38 playbooks.
Yes, when the opportunity matches one. The Content Writer handles content gaps, comparisons, FAQs, and listicles; the LinkedIn Writer handles LinkedIn presence. Other opportunities can be created as actions for your team.
The opportunity moves to in progress, then completed when the work succeeds. If the draft is rejected or fails, it reopens so you can retry.